Sall v. Sall
This text of 2011 ND 202 (Sall v. Sall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/18/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 196
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Michael Joseph Rosen, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20110071
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jackson J. Lofgren, Assistant State’s Attorney, Morton County Courthouse, 210 Second Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee.
Steven Balaban, 200 North Mandan Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Rosen
[¶1] Michael Rosen appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress and from a subsequent criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver or distribute, carrying concealed dangerous weapons, and possession of drug paraphernalia. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sall-v-sall-nd-2011.