Sall v. Luxenberg
313 So. 2d 775, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772
Opinion
Upon due consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after examination of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The granting of separate trials is discretionary and, in particular, in the instant case where the issues of tender, consideration, fraud and misrepresentation are so intermingled and entwined it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in denying separate trials on the issues raised by the pleadings. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sall v. Luxenberg, 313 So. 2d 775, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
313 So. 2d 775 (Sall v. Luxenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valliappan v. Cruz
917 So. 2d 257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Microclimate Sales Co., Inc. v. Doherty
731 So. 2d 856 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Neal v. Jackson Memorial Hospital
5 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1983)