Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sall v. Luxenberg

Sall v. Luxenberg

313 So. 2d 775, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1975
DocketNo. 75-100
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 313 So. 2d 775 (Sall v. Luxenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sall v. Luxenberg, 313 So. 2d 775, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after examination of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The granting of separate trials is discretionary and, in particular, in the instant case where the issues of tender, consideration, fraud and misrepresentation are so intermingled and entwined it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in denying separate trials on the issues raised by the pleadings. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and MAGER and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valliappan v. Cruz
917 So. 2d 257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Microclimate Sales Co., Inc. v. Doherty
731 So. 2d 856 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Neal v. Jackson Memorial Hospital
5 Fla. Supp. 2d 57 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 So. 2d 775, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sall-v-luxenberg-fladistctapp-1975.