Salkind v. Trafalgar Hospital

322 F.2d 947
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 3, 1963·No. No. 11, Docket 28120·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action brought October 16, 1959 the amount in controversy is stated to be-$10,000 exclusive of interest and costs. Judgment was entered for plaintiff on a. contract claim for severance pay of one-half the amount of a year’s salary of' $20,000, plus interest and costs, and defendant appeals. Jurisdiction is asserted: under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The 1958 amend-, ment to § 1332, however, requires an amount in controversy in excess of $10,-000, exclusive of interest and costs. Jurisdiction was lacking in the District Court. Athan v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2 Cir. 1934, 73 F.2d 66, Alderman et al. v. Elgin J & E Ry. Co., 7 Cir. 1942, 125. F.2d 971, Royal Ins. Co. of Liverpool, Eng. v. Stoddard, 8 Cir. 1912, 201 F. 915, Queen Ins. Co. of America v. Basham, W.D.Tenn.1962, 201 F.Supp. 733. The judgment of the District Court is reversed: and the case remanded with instructions, to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salkind v. Trafalgar Hospital, 322 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1963).

322 F.2d 947 (Salkind v. Trafalgar Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keles v. Yale University
889 F. Supp. 729 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Fratto v. Northern Insurance Company of New York
242 F. Supp. 262 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.
227 F. Supp. 714 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Harold M. Salkind v. Trafalgar Hospital
322 F.2d 947 (Second Circuit, 1963)