Salisbury v. Wright
35 Mo. 481
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.'
In this case the defendants below moved the court to set aside the judgment by default, because of the insufficiency [482] of the service of the process on two of the defendants. The refusal of the court to sustain his motion is the only error assigned. The decision upon the motion was not excepted to. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. There is therefore no ground for the interference of this court.
Let the judgment be affix’med.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salisbury v. Wright, 35 Mo. 481 (Mo. 1865).
35 Mo. 481 (Salisbury v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hinkley v. Little
157 S.W.2d 545 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1941)