Salisbury v. Wright

Supreme Court of Missouri

Salisbury v. Wright

35 Mo. 481

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 Mo. 481 (Salisbury v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. Wright, 35 Mo. 481 (Mo. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Dryden, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.'

In this case the defendants below moved the court to set aside the judgment by default, because of the insufficiency [482]*482of the service of the process on two of the defendants. The refusal of the court to sustain his motion is the only error assigned. The decision upon the motion was not excepted to. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. There is therefore no ground for the interference of this court.

Let the judgment be affix’med.

Judge Bay concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dryden, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.'

In this case the defendants below moved the court to set aside the judgment by default, because of the insufficiency [482]*482of the service of the process on two of the defendants. The refusal of the court to sustain his motion is the only error assigned. The decision upon the motion was not excepted to. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. There is therefore no ground for the interference of this court.

Let the judgment be affix’med.

Judge Bay concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Mo. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-wright-mo-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack