Salisbury v. Wright

35 Mo. 481
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dryden, Judge

delivered the opinion of the court.'

In this case the defendants below moved the court to set aside the judgment by default, because of the insufficiency [482] of the service of the process on two of the defendants. The refusal of the court to sustain his motion is the only error assigned. The decision upon the motion was not excepted to. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. There is therefore no ground for the interference of this court.

Let the judgment be affix’med.

Judge Bay concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salisbury v. Wright, 35 Mo. 481 (Mo. 1865).

35 Mo. 481 (Salisbury v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinkley v. Little
157 S.W.2d 545 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1941)