Salisbury v. Scott

6 Johns. 329
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a motion to refer a cause, is repelled, on the ground that questions of law will arise on the examination of the cause, the party must state what the points of law are, so that the court may judge whe'-her they are material or difficult, and will necessarily arise ; and that we may be satisfied whether the referees be a proper tribunal for the trial of the cause ; otherwise, by the general affidavit, all references may be preV vented.

[330]*3301 he motion is denied, with costs to abide the event oí , the suit,

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salisbury v. Scott, 6 Johns. 329 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

6 Johns. 329 (Salisbury v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hibbard v. Commercial Alliance Life Insurance
24 N.Y.S. 332 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)
Hibbard v. Commercial Alliance Life Insurance
53 N.Y. St. Rep. 517 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1893)
Cass v. Cass
16 N.Y.S. 229 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Patterson v. Stettauer
7 Jones & S. 413 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1875)
Dewey v. Field
13 How. Pr. 437 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)