Salisbury v. Scott

New York Supreme Court

Salisbury v. Scott

6 Johns. 329

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1810

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 6 Johns. 329 (Salisbury v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. Scott, 6 Johns. 329 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a motion to refer a cause, is repelled, on the ground that questions of law will arise on the examination of the cause, the party must state what the points of law are, so that the court may judge whe'-her they are material or difficult, and will necessarily arise ; and that we may be satisfied whether the referees be a proper tribunal for the trial of the cause ; otherwise, by the general affidavit, all references may be preV vented.

[330]*3301 he motion is denied, with costs to abide the event oí , the suit,

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where a motion to refer a cause, is repelled, on the ground that questions of law will arise on the examination of the cause, the party must state what the points of law are, so that the court may judge whe'-her they are material or difficult, and will necessarily arise ; and that we may be satisfied whether the referees be a proper tribunal for the trial of the cause ; otherwise, by the general affidavit, all references may be preV vented.

[330]*3301 he motion is denied, with costs to abide the event oí , the suit,

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Johns. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-scott-nysupct-1810.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack