Salisbury v. School District of Highland Township

Supreme Court of Iowa

Salisbury v. School District of Highland Township

70 N.W. 706, 101 Iowa 556

DecidedApril 9, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 70 N.W. 706 (Salisbury v. School District of Highland Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. School District of Highland Township, 70 N.W. 706, 101 Iowa 556 (iowa 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Ladd, J.

The plaintiff became the owner of the southwest quarter of section 29, township 95, range 40, in O’Brien county, in 1888. A public highway had been established along the section lines south and west in 1877; and in 1887 an acre, exclusive of highways, in the southwest corner of said land, was condemned for the school purposes of the defendant. The statute provides that not exceeding one acre shall be taken by condemation proceedings for the location and construction of a school house. Code, section 1825. The question involved is whether, in setting apart this acre, it shall be so measured as to include the road to its center, as claimed by plaintiff, or be exclusive of the road, as contended by defendant. In other words, a strip of land two rods wide and sixteen rods one way and ten rods the other is in dispute. The thirty-three feet to the center of the highway had already been condemned to the public use, and the defendant can only use it for the purpose of ingress and egress in common with the public. The site must be on some public highway. Code, section 1826. This means that it must be on the line of the road, so as to facilitate the use of the school property. It may be presumed that any interference with the owner’s use of the road was taken into consideration in assessing the damages. The title acquired is for school purposes only, and doubtless, in the event of the vacation of the highway suggested by the appellant, all would revert to the owner of the fee. The statute allows the condemnation of a full acre, and we are not inclined to ingraft thereon limitations not authorized merely because of possible contingencies. — Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ladd, J.

The plaintiff became the owner of the southwest quarter of section 29, township 95, range 40, in O’Brien county, in 1888. A public highway had been established along the section lines south and west in 1877; and in 1887 an acre, exclusive of highways, in the southwest corner of said land, was condemned for the school purposes of the defendant. The statute provides that not exceeding one acre shall be taken by condemation proceedings for the location and construction of a school house. Code, section 1825. The question involved is whether, in setting apart this acre, it shall be so measured as to include the road to its center, as claimed by plaintiff, or be exclusive of the road, as contended by defendant. In other words, a strip of land two rods wide and sixteen rods one way and ten rods the other is in dispute. The thirty-three feet to the center of the highway had already been condemned to the public use, and the defendant can only use it for the purpose of ingress and egress in common with the public. The site must be on some public highway. Code, section 1826. This means that it must be on the line of the road, so as to facilitate the use of the school property. It may be presumed that any interference with the owner’s use of the road was taken into consideration in assessing the damages. The title acquired is for school purposes only, and doubtless, in the event of the vacation of the highway suggested by the appellant, all would revert to the owner of the fee. The statute allows the condemnation of a full acre, and we are not inclined to ingraft thereon limitations not authorized merely because of possible contingencies. — Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 N.W. 706, 101 Iowa 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-school-district-of-highland-township-iowa-1897.