Salisbury v. Salisbury
557 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 13516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Salisbury v. Salisbury. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2911 →
Opinions
Having concluded that the record contains competent substantial evidence to support (1) the trial court’s finding that the former husband possesses the present ability to pay court ordered obligations but wilfully refuses to do so, and (2) the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s petition to modify alimony and child support payments, we affirm the trial court’s order appealed from.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salisbury v. Salisbury, 557 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 13516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 156 (Salisbury v. Salisbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eisner v. Eisner
513 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Calhoun v. Calhoun
554 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Strickler v. Strickler
548 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Lee v. Lee
544 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
DePoorter v. DePoorter
509 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Clemson v. Clemson
546 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)