Salisbury v. Salisbury

557 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 13516
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1990
DocketNo. 89-476
StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 156 (Salisbury v. Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salisbury v. Salisbury, 557 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 13516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded that the record contains competent substantial evidence to support (1) the trial court’s finding that the former husband possesses the present ability to pay court ordered obligations but wilfully refuses to do so, and (2) the trial court’s denial of the former husband’s petition to modify alimony and child support payments, we affirm the trial court’s order appealed from.

SMITH and MINER, JJ., concur. ZEHMER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisner v. Eisner
513 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Calhoun v. Calhoun
554 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Strickler v. Strickler
548 So. 2d 740 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Lee v. Lee
544 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
DePoorter v. DePoorter
509 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Clemson v. Clemson
546 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 965, 1990 WL 13516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-salisbury-fladistctapp-1990.