Salisbury v. Raines

1961 OK CR 119, 365 P.2d 568, 1961 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 29, 1961
DocketNo. A-13086
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1961 OK CR 119 (Salisbury v. Raines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salisbury v. Raines, 1961 OK CR 119, 365 P.2d 568, 1961 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Okla. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

BUSSEY, Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus by Theodore Deforest Salisbury seeking his release from the State Penitentiary at McAlester, Oklahoma, where he is currently confined by reason of a judgment and sentence rendered against him by the Honorable Raymond W. Graham, Judge of the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

The petitioner’s sole contention is that the judgment and sentence is void by reason of its uncertainty. In support of this contention the petitioner has attached a photostatic copy of the original judgment and sentence which provides that petitioner be confined in the State Penitentiary for a term of four years and further provides that: “Defendant to be given credit for the time spent in county jail, pending trial.” Petitioner urges that the addition of the statement above quoted invalidates the judgment and sentence. In State ex rel. Waters v. Lackey, 97 Okl. [569]*569Cr. 41, 257 P.2d 849, this court held that a trial judge is without authority to allow a prisoner credit for time served prior to the imposition of judgment and sentence and that the only method whereby the court may take into consideration the time of imprisonment prior to judgment and sentence is when it imposes said judgment and sentence. In view of the authority above cited we are of the opinion that the phrase “Defendant to be given credit for the time spent in county jail, pending trial,” was mere surplusage and did not invalidate the judgment and sentence.

The writ is accordingly denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kennedy
472 P.2d 59 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1970)
Newell v. Page
280 F. Supp. 203 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1961 OK CR 119, 365 P.2d 568, 1961 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-raines-oklacrimapp-1961.