Salisbury v. Philips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Salisbury v. Philips

272 A.D.2d 1036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1036 (Salisbury v. Philips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. Philips, 272 A.D.2d 1036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. We regard the order as containing a direction for a new trial. All concur; Dowling, J., not voting. (The order grants defendant’s [Vandermark’s] motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, but denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and for a nonsuit in a negligence action.) Present — Dowling, Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. We regard the order as containing a direction for a new trial. All concur; Dowling, J., not voting. (The order grants defendant’s [Vandermark’s] motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, but denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and for a nonsuit in a negligence action.) Present — Dowling, Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-philips-nyappdiv-1947.