Salisbury v. People

New York Supreme Court

Salisbury v. People

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 64

DecidedJune 15, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 64 (Salisbury v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. People, 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 64 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and conviction affirmed, and proceedings remitted to the Cattaraugus Oyer and Terminer to proceed thereon. Held, that the declaration of the prisoner offered to be proved was not a part of the res gestee, and that the conversation with Sealey, not having taken place in the presence of the prisoner or the deceased, nor having been communicated to either of them, was irrelevant and inadmissible.

Haight, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and conviction affirmed, and proceedings remitted to the Cattaraugus Oyer and Terminer to proceed thereon. Held, that the declaration of the prisoner offered to be proved was not a part of the res gestee, and that the conversation with Sealey, not having taken place in the presence of the prisoner or the deceased, nor having been communicated to either of them, was irrelevant and inadmissible.

Haight, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-people-nysupct-1881.