Salisbury v. Matthews
78 Mass. 333
Opinion
We perceive no sufficient reason for setting aside this award. This was, as we understand, a reference of the case in broad terms to a referee. This carried with it the case for which the plaintiff claimed damages, irrespectively of the precise technical form in which it was set out. Clearly one defective count would not vitiate a general award, if there was a good cause of action substantially set out in another. Forseth v. Shaw, 10 Mass. 253. Page v. Monks, 5 Gray, 492.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salisbury v. Matthews, 78 Mass. 333 (Mass. 1859).
78 Mass. 333 (Salisbury v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Forseth v. Shaw
10 Mass. 253 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)