Salisbury v. Fairfield

Connecticut Superior Court

Salisbury v. Fairfield

1 Root 131

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1789

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Root 131 (Salisbury v. Fairfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury v. Fairfield, 1 Root 131 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

[132]*132And

by the Court.

Tbe pauper’s residing in Stamford as an apprentice gained no settlement; and Ms residing there with, bis guardian three years, gained no settlement, neither in right of his guardian, nor in Ms own right by commorancy; he was not a subject of being warned, nor might he be parted from his guardian during his minority; his residence therefore in Stamford was of necessity, and not by the approbation of the town of Stamford.

This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court of Errors..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[132]*132And

by the Court.

Tbe pauper’s residing in Stamford as an apprentice gained no settlement; and Ms residing there with, bis guardian three years, gained no settlement, neither in right of his guardian, nor in Ms own right by commorancy; he was not a subject of being warned, nor might he be parted from his guardian during his minority; his residence therefore in Stamford was of necessity, and not by the approbation of the town of Stamford.

This judgment was affirmed in the Supreme Court of Errors..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-fairfield-connsuperct-1789.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack