Salisbury v. Dibble

100 Misc. 191
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 100 Misc. 191 (Salisbury v. Dibble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salisbury v. Dibble, 100 Misc. 191 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1917).

Opinion

Rodenbeck, J.

The referee’s fees and disbursements herein should be reduced by deducting therefrom fifty dollars for referee’s fees and five dollars for the expense of posting notices on the first sale and two dollars and twenty cents for the expense of posting notices on the second sale. The referee’s fees are fixed by statute in these cases (Code Civ. Pro. [192]*192§§ 3297, 3307, subd. 8), and Ms compensation including commissions cannot exceed the sum of fifty dollars, nor can he be allowed more than that sum where there is more than one sale. Caryl v. Stafford, 69 Hun, 318. There is no provision of the statute for the allowance of the expense of posting notices. These expenses are included in the item allowed for posting notices and the sum of seven dollars and twenty cents which was included in the referee’s report of sale for these expenses should be deducted, making a total deduction of fifty-seven dollars and twenty cents. Walbridge v. James, 16 Hun, 8; Harburger v. St. John’s A. M. E. Church, 87 Misc. Rep. 227.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harburger v. St. John's African Methodist Episcopal Church
87 Misc. 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Misc. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-v-dibble-nysupct-1917.