Salisbury Sales Corp. v. MG Patchogue Ltd. Partnership

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Salisbury Sales Corp. v. MG Patchogue Ltd. Partnership

282 A.D.2d 595, 722 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 595 (Salisbury Sales Corp. v. MG Patchogue Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salisbury Sales Corp. v. MG Patchogue Ltd. Partnership, 282 A.D.2d 595, 722 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated March 6, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment as material issues of fact exist as to which party, if either, terminated the lease involved in this case (see, Rachmani Corp. v 9 E. 96th St. Apt. Corp., 211 AD2d 262).

The defendant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated March 6, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment as material issues of fact exist as to which party, if either, terminated the lease involved in this case (see, Rachmani Corp. v 9 E. 96th St. Apt. Corp., 211 AD2d 262).

The defendant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. O’Brien, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 595, 722 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salisbury-sales-corp-v-mg-patchogue-ltd-partnership-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack