Salinger v. Rupel
135 N.E. 179, 78 Ind. App. 197, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 93
This text of 135 N.E. 179 (Salinger v. Rupel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Salinger v. Rupel, 135 N.E. 179, 78 Ind. App. 197, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 93 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
— Appellant appeals from a decree foreclosing a mechanic’s lien, and in support of his assignment of errors and brief in support thereof has made a prima facie showing of reversible errors. Appellee has filed no brief and under the circumstances we will treat such failure as a confession of errors.
The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bryant v. School Town of Oakland City
171 N.E. 378 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1930)
Remington v. Edwards
138 N.E. 824 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 179, 78 Ind. App. 197, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salinger-v-rupel-indctapp-1922.