Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 11, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-01140·Unknown

Opinion

KEVIN E. GAUT (SBN 117352), keg@msk.com EMMA LUEVANO (SBN 198421), eyl@msk.com 2049 Century Park East, 18th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3120 Telephone: (310) 312-2000 Facsimile: (310) 312-3100

Attorneys for Defendants Nestle Purina PetCare Company and Nestlé USA, Inc.

CAROLYN H. COTTRELL (SBN 166977), ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com ORI EDELSTEIN (SBN 268145), oedelstein@schneiderwallace.com ANDREW WEAVER (SBN 318935), aweaver@schneiderwallace.com PHILIPPE M. GAUDARD (SBN 331744), pgaudard@schneiderwallace.com 2000 Powell St., Suite 1400 Emeryville, CA 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105

Attorneys for Plaintiff Emmanuel Salinas, on behalf of the himself and the Class members

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EMMANUEL SALINAS, on behalf of himself Case No.: 1:21-CV-01140-JLT-BAK (BAM) and the Class members, Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY; NESTLÉ USA, INC., Defendants. Plaintiff Emmanuel Salinas (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Nestlé Purina PetCare Company and Nestlé USA, Inc. (“Defendants” and, together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) hereby agree as follows: 1. INTRODUCTION This action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. Such confidential, proprietary or private information may include, among other things and without limitation, information regarding Defendants’ confidential business practices, including relevant human resources and safety policies and practices; confidential information implicating privacy rights of third parties, including personnel documentation; information otherwise generally unavailable to the public; or information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. B. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL The Parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS Action: the instant action, titled Salinas v. Nestlé Purina Petcare Company and Nestlé USA, Inc, Case No. 1:21-cv-01140-JLT-BAK, including any related mediation or settlement procedures. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for confidentiality protection for Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, paper documents, testimony, transcripts, databases, emails or other electronic documents, and tangible things), produced or generated in this matter, including but not limited to disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter or exchanges of information for mediation purposes. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that Party, and includes support staff. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL Manner and Timing of Designations. Confidential designations may be made as follows: a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Designating Party may affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that contains protected material A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection need not would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. b) for testimony given in depositions, the Designating Party may identify any such testimony as CONFIDENTIAL at any time within 10 days following receipt of the transcript. Before such time, the transcripts shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in their entirety. c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, the Designating Party may affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” Failures to Designate. Failure to designate qualified information or items in accordance with Section 5.1 does not waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon a l

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company (Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)