Salinas v. Mason

627 So. 2d 525, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 1993 WL 414201
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1993
DocketNo. 92-04118
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 525 (Salinas v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salinas v. Mason, 627 So. 2d 525, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 1993 WL 414201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinions

RYDER, Judge.

Arturo Salmas, Jr. attacks the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice his complaint alleging intentional sexual abuse which occurred approximately fifteen years ago. We reverse because this court recently ruled in Roof v. Wiley, 622 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), rehearing denied, No. 91-04243 (Fla.2d DCA Aug. 24, 1993), that section 2 of Chapter 92-102, amending section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1992 Supp.), revived for a four-year period previously time-barred causes of action based on intentional abuse or incest. The four-year window commenced April 8,1992, and Salinas’ complaint was filed within this period on August 26, 1992.

Reversed and remanded.

FRANK, C.J., concurs. HALL, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mason v. Salinas
643 So. 2d 1077 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Clements v. Sheffield
626 So. 2d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
627 So. 2d 525, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10659, 1993 WL 414201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salinas-v-mason-fladistctapp-1993.