Salina City v. Freece

216 P. 1078, 61 Utah 574, 1923 Utah LEXIS 48
Utah Supreme Court·Decided July 19, 1923·No. No. 3967·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

WEBER, C. J.

Eiler Freece ivas convicted before the justice of the peace for the city of Salina on a charge of having violated the merchants’ license ordinance of that city. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to the district court of Sevier county, which court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and [575]*575dismissed tbe action. The city of Salina appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a city cannot appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a criminal action arising in a justice of the peace court.

In Castle Dale v. Woolley, 61 Utah 291, 212 Pac. 1111, it was held by this court that—

“Neither the Constitution nor statutes of this state authorize a city to appeal from a judgment of the city justice’s court in favor of the defendant, * * * in a criminal case for the violation of a city ordinance.”

It follows that a city cannot appeal from the judgment of the district' court in a criminal action for the violation of a city ordinance, where the action originates in the court of a city justice.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with costs to respondent.

GIDEON, THURMAN, and CHERRY, JJ., concur. FRICK, J., did not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salina City v. Freece, 216 P. 1078, 61 Utah 574, 1923 Utah LEXIS 48 (Utah 1923).

216 P. 1078 (Salina City v. Freece) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Taylor
664 P.2d 439 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)
State Ex Rel. Marquette v. Police Court
283 P. 430 (Montana Supreme Court, 1929)
Scipio, a Municipal Corp. v. Grantly Olsen
265 P. 1117 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)
Town of Ophir v. Jorgensen
225 P. 342 (Utah Supreme Court, 1924)