Salina City v. Freece
This text of 216 P. 1078 (Salina City v. Freece) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eiler Freece ivas convicted before the justice of the peace for the city of Salina on a charge of having violated the merchants’ license ordinance of that city. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to the district court of Sevier county, which court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and [575]*575dismissed tbe action. The city of Salina appeals from the judgment of dismissal.
The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a city cannot appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a criminal action arising in a justice of the peace court.
In Castle Dale v. Woolley, 61 Utah 291, 212 Pac. 1111, it was held by this court that—
“Neither the Constitution nor statutes of this state authorize a city to appeal from a judgment of the city justice’s court in favor of the defendant, * * * in a criminal case for the violation of a city ordinance.”
It follows that a city cannot appeal from the judgment of the district' court in a criminal action for the violation of a city ordinance, where the action originates in the court of a city justice.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 P. 1078, 61 Utah 574, 1923 Utah LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salina-city-v-freece-utah-1923.