Salih El Bey v. Heifner

Fourth Circuit

Salih El Bey v. Heifner

98 F. App'x 255

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 2004

DocketNo. 03-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 98 F. App'x 255 (Salih El Bey v. Heifner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salih El Bey v. Heifner, 98 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

SaMma Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bey v. Heifner, No. CA-02-459-2-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

SaMma Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bey v. Heifner, No. CA-02-459-2-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. App'x 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salih-el-bey-v-heifner-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack