Salig v. United States Life Insurance
84 A. 826, 236 Pa. 460, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 778
Opinion
This action was brought on a policy of insurance issued by the appellee. A jury trial was waived, and no one of the seven facts found by the court below is assigned as error. From them, and especially from the sixth, the conclusion was inevitable that the plaintiffs could not recover, and the judgment for the defendant is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salig v. United States Life Insurance, 84 A. 826, 236 Pa. 460, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 778 (Pa. 1912).
84 A. 826 (Salig v. United States Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
187 A. 251 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Hammond v. Volunteer State Life Insurance
170 S.E. 681 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Adams v. Mutual Life Insurance
132 N.E. 688 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)
Carter v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
107 A. 847 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. Benson
187 S.W. 351 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)