Saliba v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Saliba v. State

186 So. 787, 28 Ala. App. 460, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 110

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 1939

Docket8 Div. 749.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 So. 787 (Saliba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saliba v. State, 186 So. 787, 28 Ala. App. 460, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 110 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

On the trial the defendant interposed a demurrer to the indictment, which demurrer was, by the Court, overruled. Thereupon, the cause proceeded to trial upon the plea of not guilty, upon which plea was returned a verdict of guilty, and the judgment of the Court was rendered on said verdict.

The demurrer is filed to the indictment as a whole, therefore, if any count of the indictment charges an offense, the demurrer is properly overruled.

We hold that each count of the ; indictment sufficiently charges the defendant with a violation of the law, and that . neither count was subject to the demurrer.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI