Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance

132 A. 921, 81 N.H. 550, 1924 N.H. LEXIS 67
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 2, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Plummer, J.

The only question raised by the defendant’s exceptions is whether the refusal of the court to find as requested and the findings and verdict are warranted by the evidence.

A careful examination of the record leads to the conclusion that there was evidence which warranted the findings and rulings made by the court.

Exceptions overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance, 132 A. 921, 81 N.H. 550, 1924 N.H. LEXIS 67 (N.H. 1924).

132 A. 921 (Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Buren v. Plainfield Trust Co.
22 A.2d 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)
In re the Estate of March
6 A.2d 478 (Atlantic County Surrogate's Court, 1939)