Salgado v. State
684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13437, 1996 WL 734834
Opinion
We affirm Osvaldo Salgado’s convictions and sentences, as they were entered pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. See Salazar v. State, 675 So.2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). However, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct the judgment which fines Salgado $5,000,000; the fine shall be corrected to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of $500,000.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salgado v. State, 684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13437, 1996 WL 734834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
684 So. 2d 341 (Salgado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salazar v. State
675 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)