Salgado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Salgado v. State

684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13437, 1996 WL 734834

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 26, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2575

StatusPublished

This text of 684 So. 2d 341 (Salgado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salgado v. State, 684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13437, 1996 WL 734834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Osvaldo Salgado’s convictions and sentences, as they were entered pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. See Salazar v. State, 675 So.2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). However, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct the judgment which fines Salgado $5,000,000; the fine shall be corrected to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of $500,000.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Osvaldo Salgado’s convictions and sentences, as they were entered pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. See Salazar v. State, 675 So.2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). However, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct the judgment which fines Salgado $5,000,000; the fine shall be corrected to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of $500,000.

Affirmed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 So. 2d 341, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13437, 1996 WL 734834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salgado-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack