Salesky v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Salesky v. State

256 So. 2d 250

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 1972·No. Nos. O-261, P-165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Richards v. State (Fla.App.1968), 214 So.2d 31; Wilder v. State (Fla.App.1963), 156 So.2d 395.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Richards v. State (Fla.App.1968), 214 So.2d 31; Wilder v. State (Fla.App.1963), 156 So.2d 395.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Salesky v. State, 256 So. 2d 250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

256 So. 2d 250 (Salesky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related