Sales v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Sales v. State

155 So. 923, 26 Ala. App. 683

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1934·No. 8 Div. 933.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

It is sufficient, in disposing of this appeal, to say that the court has examined the proceedings, including the bill of exceptions, sitting en ban?;, and that it is our opinion that there is no testimony tending to show the violation of any law.

To the contrary, the state’s testimony shows that no law was violated. It should have been excluded upon appellant’s motion, duly made.

For the error committed in overruling said motion, the judgment of conviction is reversed ; and, it appearing as aforesaid herein, it is ordered that appellant be discharged.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

It is sufficient, in disposing of this appeal, to say that the court has examined the proceedings, including the bill of exceptions, sitting en ban?;, and that it is our opinion that there is no testimony tending to show the violation of any law.

To the contrary, the state’s testimony shows that no law was violated. It should have been excluded upon appellant’s motion, duly made.

For the error committed in overruling said motion, the judgment of conviction is reversed ; and, it appearing as aforesaid herein, it is ordered that appellant be discharged.

Reversed and rendered.

Sales v. State, 155 So. 923, 26 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

155 So. 923 (Sales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.