Sales, Tarus Vandell
This text of Sales, Tarus Vandell (Sales, Tarus Vandell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
NO. WR-78,131-02
EX PARTE TARUS VANDELL SALES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. 893161-B IN THE 179 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
In May 2003, a jury found Applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. See
T EX. P ENAL C ODE § 19.03(a). Based on the jury’s answers to the statutory punishment
questions set out in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, the trial court
sentenced Applicant to death.1 This Court affirmed Applicant’s conviction and sentence
on direct appeal. Sales v. State, No. AP-74,594 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 26, 2005) (not
designated for publication). We denied relief on Applicant’s initial post-conviction
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this order to Articles refer to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Sales - 2
application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Sales, No. WR-78,131-01 (Tex. Crim.
App. Jan. 14, 2015) (not designated for publication).
On July 10, 2017, Applicant filed in the trial court his first subsequent application
for a writ of habeas corpus. After reviewing the application, this Court determined that a
preliminary matter regarding his first allegation needed to be resolved before it could be
determined whether Applicant had met the dictates of Article 11.071 § 5. We remanded
the application to the trial court for a review of the preliminary matter and a possible
review of the merits of the first allegation. Ex parte Sales, No. WR-78,131-02 (Tex.
Crim. App. Feb. 14, 2018) (not designated for publication).
It has been almost three years since we remanded the application to the trial court.
Accordingly, we order the trial court to resolve any remaining issues in the case within 90
days from the date of this order. The clerk shall then immediately transmit the complete
writ record to this Court. Any extensions of time shall be requested by the trial judge, or
on his or her behalf, and obtained from this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sales, Tarus Vandell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sales-tarus-vandell-texcrimapp-2021.