Salerno v. Salerno

300 A.D.2d 667, 751 N.Y.S.2d 794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Bangs County [668] (Weinstein, J.), dated December 5, 2001, which granted the mother’s postdisposition application for an attorney’s fee and expert fee in the sum of $11,577.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the mother the full cost of the expert’s fee and a percentage of her reasonable attorney’s fee, considering the parties’ disparate incomes and the fact that some of the mother’s fees were incurred because of the father’s dilatory tactics (see O’Shea v O’Shea, 93 NY2d 187; Krigsman v Krigsman, 288 AD2d 189).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salerno v. Salerno, 300 A.D.2d 667, 751 N.Y.S.2d 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 667 (Salerno v. Salerno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abidi v. Antohi
64 A.D.3d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)