Salentine & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Salentine & Co. v. United States

25 Cust. Ct. 284, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 342

United States Customs Court·Decided October 3, 1950·No. No. 54717; protests 153513-K and 153514-K (Milwaukee)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff abandoned protest 153513-K insofar as it relates to entries 261, 292, 293, 294, 295, 327, 328, 337, and 338, and protest 153514-K insofar as it relates to entries 234, 235, 396, 502, 562, and 591. The protests were dismissed as to the enumerated entries. Insofar as protest 153513-K relates to entries 291, 325, and 326, and protest 153514-K relates to entries 397, 500, 561, and 592, counsel for the [285]*285defendant conceded Ike correctness of the claim made by the plaintiff for duty at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (f), as-modified. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the case was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff abandoned protest 153513-K insofar as it relates to entries 261, 292, 293, 294, 295, 327, 328, 337, and 338, and protest 153514-K insofar as it relates to entries 234, 235, 396, 502, 562, and 591. The protests were dismissed as to the enumerated entries. Insofar as protest 153513-K relates to entries 291, 325, and 326, and protest 153514-K relates to entries 397, 500, 561, and 592, counsel for the [285]*285defendant conceded Ike correctness of the claim made by the plaintiff for duty at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (f), as-modified. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.

Salentine & Co. v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 284, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 342 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

25 Cust. Ct. 284 (Salentine & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.