Salem v. Sperber

189 A. 865, 88 N.H. 374, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 56
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedFebruary 2, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 A. 865 (Salem v. Sperber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salem v. Sperber, 189 A. 865, 88 N.H. 374, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 56 (N.H. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The statute (P. L., c. 66, s. 25) requires the purchaser of real estate sold by a tax collector to give notice to mortgagees within thirty days from the sale, and the sale “shall be void as against any mortgagee to whom such notice” is not given. The requirement of notice within the time specified is a material condition “because the statute makes it so.” Derry Bank v. Griffin, 68 N. H. 183, 184. The principle that in all cases of sales of real estate for non-payment of taxes “every prerequisite to the exercise of the power must precede its exercise” (Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N. H. 556, 569) extends to matters to be performed in order that a sale include a mortgage interest, and the statutory regulations are fixed and rigid.

Decree for defendant.

Page, J., was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olson v. Town of Fitzwilliam
702 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1997)
Cross v. Linski
354 A.2d 409 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 A. 865, 88 N.H. 374, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salem-v-sperber-nh-1937.