Saleh v. Hochberg

5 A.D.3d 234, 772 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2648
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2004·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered January 10, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendants’ motion for sanctions insofar as to direct plaintiff to pay the reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in the defense of the action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Since the record discloses that plaintiff, in prolonged litigation, pursued causes of action that were clearly time-barred and otherwise without arguable merit, the motion court’s determination that plaintiff should bear the reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in the action’s defense constituted a proper exercise of discretion (see 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a]). The motion court adequately set forth the grounds for exacting costs and attorneys’ fees from plaintiff pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 and in so doing was not required to follow the procedural dictates of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2 “in any rigid fashion” (Benefield v New York City Hous. Auth., 260 AD2d 167, 168 [1999]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saleh v. Hochberg, 5 A.D.3d 234, 772 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 234 (Saleh v. Hochberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singh v. New York City Hous. Auth.
2021 NY Slip Op 05798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Board of Mgrs. of the Legacy Condominium v. Core Mgt. NY, LLC
2020 NY Slip Op 2169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Liang v. Wei Ji
2017 NY Slip Op 8361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Duncan v. Popoli
105 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Yenom Corp. v. 155 Wooster Street Inc.
23 A.D.3d 259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)