Saledo Realty Corp. v. Robinson

5 Misc. 2d 613, 164 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1564
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided September 24, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The vacation of the final order especially after the warrant had been issued was not justified under the circumstances presented (Hendricks v. Ergis, 66 N. Y. S. 2d 349; Hanover Bank v. De Koenigsberg, 207 Misc. 1088, affd. 285 App. Div. 928).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order for landlord reinstated, with costs.

Hoestadter, Hecht and Aurelio, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saledo Realty Corp. v. Robinson, 5 Misc. 2d 613, 164 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

5 Misc. 2d 613 (Saledo Realty Corp. v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucente v. International Business MacHines Corp.
75 F. Supp. 2d 169 (S.D. New York, 1999)