Saleda Taylor v. Carolyn Colvin

639 F. App'x 204
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 9, 2016·No. 15-1296·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Saleda Taylor appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Colvin, No. 7:13-cv-00220-JG (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

Taylor has waived appellate review of her claims under Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632 (4th Cir.2015). See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir.2014) (recognizing issues raised for first time on appeal generally will not be considered); Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp., 181 F.3d 597, 605-06 (4th Cir. 1999) (describing limitations on exception based on intervening change in law).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saleda Taylor v. Carolyn Colvin, 639 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 204 (Saleda Taylor v. Carolyn Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn Colvin
780 F.3d 632 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)
Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp.
181 F.3d 597 (Fourth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Lavabit, LLC.
749 F.3d 276 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)