Saleda Taylor v. Carolyn Colvin
This text of 639 F. App'x 204 (Saleda Taylor v. Carolyn Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Saleda Taylor appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Colvin, No. 7:13-cv-00220-JG (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Taylor has waived appellate review of her claims under Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632 (4th Cir.2015). See In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir.2014) (recognizing issues raised for first time on appeal generally will not be considered); Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp., 181 F.3d 597, 605-06 (4th Cir. 1999) (describing limitations on exception based on intervening change in law).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saleda-taylor-v-carolyn-colvin-ca4-2016.