Saldane v. State

923 So. 2d 1198, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555, 2006 WL 626093
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2006·No. No. 3D06-187·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant contends that he does not qualify as a habitual offender. See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001). On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse [1199]*1199the order and remand for further proceedings or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saldane v. State, 923 So. 2d 1198, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3555, 2006 WL 626093 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

923 So. 2d 1198 (Saldane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)