Saldana v. State
17 So. 3d 338, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10599, 2009 WL 2338046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Saldana v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 980 So. 2d 1220 →
Opinion
We affirm the appealed order. Moreover, after having painstakingly collected *339 and reviewed this appellant’s series of post-conviction filings and appeals, which are remarkable for their incoherence, inaccuracy and frivolousness, we deem it appropriate to order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999), that appellant Saldana show cause within ten days from the date of this opinion why he should not be barred from any further pro se filings in this court concerning his 1992 and 1999 convictions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saldana v. State, 17 So. 3d 338, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10599, 2009 WL 2338046 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
17 So. 3d 338 (Saldana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)