Saldana v. Miami-Dade County
This text of 978 So. 2d 823 (Saldana v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raul SALDANA, Appellant,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY and Division of Risk Management, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Richard A. Sicking, Coral Gables, for Appellant.
R.A. Cuevas, Jr., Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Lynda S. Slade, Assistant County Attorney, Miami, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See City of Tarpon Springs v. Vaporis, 953 So.2d 597, 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("All that [section 112.18, Florida Statutes] requires to overcome the presumption is competent substantial evidence that convinces a JCC that *824 the disease was caused by some non-work-related factor, not that it was caused by any sort of `specific hazard or non-occupational hazard'. . . . ").
ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
978 So. 2d 823, 2008 WL 623244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saldana-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2008.