Salazar v. State
757 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6590, 2000 WL 690126
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1290·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence, but certify direct conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), as to the applicable window period.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salazar v. State, 757 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6590, 2000 WL 690126 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
757 So. 2d 1282 (Salazar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hansbrough v. State
757 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)