Salazar v. State
757 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6590, 2000 WL 690126
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-1290
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 757 So. 2d 1282 (Salazar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Salazar v. State, 757 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6590, 2000 WL 690126 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence, but certify direct conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), as to the applicable window period.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hansbrough v. State
757 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
757 So. 2d 1282, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6590, 2000 WL 690126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.