Salazar v. Salazar

583 So. 2d 797, 1991 WL 151961
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 1991
Docket91-62
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 583 So. 2d 797 (Salazar v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salazar v. Salazar, 583 So. 2d 797, 1991 WL 151961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

583 So.2d 797 (1991)

Antonio Marcos SALAZAR, Husband, Appellant,
v.
Michael Diane SALAZAR, Wife, Appellee.

No. 91-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

August 9, 1991.

Lawrence C. Datz, of Datz, Jacobson & Lembcke, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Richard R. Townsend, Orange Park, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm the trial court's denial of the husband's motion for relief from final judgment of dissolution of marriage and his motion for modification except insofar as it relates to the final judgment's adoption of the parties' stipulation providing that the wife receive 32.5 percent of the husband's Naval retirement benefits when they vest. Following entry of the final judgment, the husband learned that he would be promoted to the rank of Commander with a concomitant increase in salary. Since the husband's retirement benefits will accordingly be increased, the wife will receive 32.5 percent of retirement benefits made up in part of non-marital funds. The record does not reflect that it was intended by the parties that the wife would receive any benefits from what appears to be an uncontemplated *798 promotion. Consequently, we reverse the order denying the motion for modification to that extent and remand for further proceedings to readjust the wife's interest in the husband's retirement benefits according to law.

WOLF, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodson v. Go
166 So. 3d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Mariano v. Mariano
2005 OK CIV APP 77 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2005)
Coons v. Coons
765 So. 2d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Blevins v. Blevins
649 So. 2d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Kendrick v. Kendrick
902 S.W.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1994)
In Re the Marriage of Hunt
868 P.2d 1140 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 So. 2d 797, 1991 WL 151961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-v-salazar-fladistctapp-1991.