Salazar v. Mukasey

302 F. App'x 622
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. No. 07-71248·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Meliton Cervantes Salazar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an [623] Immigration Judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that Salazar failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). Salazar’s contention that the BIA failed to adequately consider and weigh all the evidence of hardship does not raise a color-able due process claim. Id. (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salazar v. Mukasey, 302 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2008).

302 F. App'x 622 (Salazar v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related