Salazar v. Holder

376 F. App'x 736
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2010
Docket07-74956
StatusUnpublished

This text of 376 F. App'x 736 (Salazar v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salazar v. Holder, 376 F. App'x 736 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Oswaldo Antonio Salazar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under Immigration and Nationality Act § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s dispositive discretionary determination that Salazar did not merit a grant of § 212(h) relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Mejia v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 991, 999 (9th Cir.2007).

Salazar’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mejia v. Gonzales
499 F.3d 991 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F. App'x 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-v-holder-ca9-2010.