Salazar v. Ashcroft

92 F. App'x 528
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2004·No. No. 02-71098·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Evangelina Angel Salazar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition.

We do not need to review whether Angel Salazar has proven ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b), because we lack jurisdiction to review the immigration judge’s discretionary determination that Angel Salazar has failed to demonstrate the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” for cancellation of removal. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salazar v. Ashcroft, 92 F. App'x 528 (9th Cir. 2004).

92 F. App'x 528 (Salazar v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related