Salazar-Regino v. Trominski

Fifth Circuit

Salazar-Regino v. Trominski

479 F.3d 362, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3227, 2007 WL 457992

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2007

DocketNo. 03-41492

StatusPublished

This text of 479 F.3d 362 (Salazar-Regino v. Trominski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salazar-Regino v. Trominski, 479 F.3d 362, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3227, 2007 WL 457992 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In Salazar-Regino v. Moore, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 827, 166 L.Ed.2d 660 (2006), the Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, and this court’s opinion, Salazar-Regino v. Trominski, 415 F.3d 436 (5th Cir.2005), was vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). We have invited the parties to submit letters stating what action they wish this court to take on remand. We are in agreement with the joint request of the parties and therefore direct the following:

As to petitioner Jose Oviedo-Sifuentes, no remand is warranted at this time. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing schedule to address any remaining issues that were not addressed in our prior opinion.

As to the other petitioners who have appealed under Fifth Circuit No. 03-41492, to-wit, Laura Salazar-Regino, Teodulo Cantu-Delgadillo, Daniel Carrizales-Per-ez, Manuel Sandoval-Herrera, Raul Hernandez Pantoja, Cesar Lucio, Práxedis Rodriguez, and Nohemi Rangel-Rivera, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration in light of Lopez.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In Salazar-Regino v. Moore, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 827, 166 L.Ed.2d 660 (2006), the Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, and this court’s opinion, Salazar-Regino v. Trominski, 415 F.3d 436 (5th Cir.2005), was vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). We have invited the parties to submit letters stating what action they wish this court to take on remand. We are in agreement with the joint request of the parties and therefore direct the following:

As to petitioner Jose Oviedo-Sifuentes, no remand is warranted at this time. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing schedule to address any remaining issues that were not addressed in our prior opinion.

As to the other petitioners who have appealed under Fifth Circuit No. 03-41492, to-wit, Laura Salazar-Regino, Teodulo Cantu-Delgadillo, Daniel Carrizales-Per-ez, Manuel Sandoval-Herrera, Raul Hernandez Pantoja, Cesar Lucio, Práxedis Rodriguez, and Nohemi Rangel-Rivera, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration in light of Lopez.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 F.3d 362, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3227, 2007 WL 457992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-regino-v-trominski-ca5-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack