Salazar, Orlando
This text of Salazar, Orlando (Salazar, Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,452-01
IN RE ORLANDO SALAZAR, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. C-08-0822-SA IN THE 340th DISTRICT COURT FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
in the 340th District Court of Tom Green County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the
application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Tom
Green County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such
habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be
investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that 2
Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Tom Green County. Should the
response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was
served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for
leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the
appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.
Filed: March 22, 2017 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Salazar, Orlando, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-orlando-texcrimapp-2017.