Salazar-Fuentes v. Holder

474 F. App'x 548
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2012·No. 07-73010·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mateo Austreberto Salazar-Fuentes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Ap *549 peals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

In concluding that Salazar-Fuentes’s conviction under California Vehicle Code § 10851(a) was an aggravated felony theft offense, the BIA did not have the benefit of our decisions in United States v. Vidal, 504 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc), and Penuliar v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 603 (9th Cir.2008). We therefore remand to the BIA to reevaluate Salazar-Fuentes’s re-movability in light of these intervening decisions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salazar-Fuentes v. Holder, 474 F. App'x 548 (9th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 548 (Salazar-Fuentes v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Vidal
504 F.3d 1072 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Penuliar v. Mukasey
528 F.3d 603 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)