Salazar, Francisco
This text of Salazar, Francisco (Salazar, Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-86,489-01
EX PARTE FRANCISCO SALAZAR, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 11-05-05000-CR(1) IN THE 9TH DISTRICT COURT FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of
continuous sexual abuse of a child, one count of indecency with a child, and one count of sexual
assault of a child and was sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment, ten years’ imprisonment, and
twenty years’ imprisonment, to run concurrently.
Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to
timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court has determined that trial counsel prepared a notice of 2
appeal, but that the notice was lost somewhere between its execution and its inclusion in the records
maintained by the district clerk’s office. The trial court finds that Applicant desired to appeal, but
that he was denied the right to do so through no fault of his own. We find that Applicant is entitled
to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 11-05-
05000-CR(1) from the 9th District Court of Montgomery County. Applicant is ordered returned to
that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel,
obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall
determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by
counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal.
All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the
mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must
take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the
mandate of this Court issues.
Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Delivered: March 22, 2017 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Salazar, Francisco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salazar-francisco-texcrimapp-2017.