Salatino v. State

660 So. 2d 627, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 226, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 727, 1995 WL 273942
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 1995
DocketNo. 84804
StatusPublished

This text of 660 So. 2d 627 (Salatino v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salatino v. State, 660 So. 2d 627, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 226, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 727, 1995 WL 273942 (Fla. 1995).

Opinions

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Salatino v. State, 644 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), wherein the district court upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and certified:

[628]*628Is section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), facially unconstitutional as vague and overbroad?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 8(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.1995). Accordingly we approve Salatino on this issue.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salatino v. State
644 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Bouters v. State
659 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 So. 2d 627, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 226, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 727, 1995 WL 273942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salatino-v-state-fla-1995.