Salas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Salas v. State

243 S.W.2d 174, 156 Tex. Crim. 395, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1605

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 17, 1951·No. No. 25387·Published

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the murder of Lorenzo Santos. The appeal is from a sentence of not less than two nor more than three years in the penitentiary.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict We find no fundamental error in the record. There are no bills of exception and nothing is presented for our consideration.

Able oral argument was presented in this case in which the contention was made that the court committed error in the matter of admission of testimony. This could only be brought forward by bill of exception, which was not done.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the murder of Lorenzo Santos. The appeal is from a sentence of not less than two nor more than three years in the penitentiary.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict We find no fundamental error in the record. There are no bills of exception and nothing is presented for our consideration.

Able oral argument was presented in this case in which the contention was made that the court committed error in the matter of admission of testimony. This could only be brought forward by bill of exception, which was not done.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Salas v. State, 243 S.W.2d 174, 156 Tex. Crim. 395, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1605 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

243 S.W.2d 174 (Salas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.