Salas v. State

243 S.W.2d 174, 156 Tex. Crim. 395, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1605
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 17, 1951
DocketNo. 25387
StatusPublished

This text of 243 S.W.2d 174 (Salas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salas v. State, 243 S.W.2d 174, 156 Tex. Crim. 395, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1605 (Tex. 1951).

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for the murder of Lorenzo Santos. The appeal is from a sentence of not less than two nor more than three years in the penitentiary.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict We find no fundamental error in the record. There are no bills of exception and nothing is presented for our consideration.

Able oral argument was presented in this case in which the contention was made that the court committed error in the matter of admission of testimony. This could only be brought forward by bill of exception, which was not done.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 S.W.2d 174, 156 Tex. Crim. 395, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salas-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.