Salas v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Salas v. Stansberry

192 F. App'x 236

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2006·No. No. 05-6306·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Hilario Mateo Salas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) peti[237]*237tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Salas v. Stansberry, No. 5:04-hc-00979-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Hilario Mateo Salas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) peti[237]*237tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Salas v. Stansberry, No. 5:04-hc-00979-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Salas v. Stansberry, 192 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

192 F. App'x 236 (Salas v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related