Salas-Rojos v. Cruise Line
This text of 106 F.3d 383 (Salas-Rojos v. Cruise Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
106 F.3d 383
NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Jesus SALAS-RIJOS and Ana Salas, Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
COSTA CRUISE LINES, N.V., et al., Defendants, Appellees.
No. 96-1503.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Jan. 14, 1997.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge]
Harry A. Ezratty on brief for appellants.
William A. Graffam, Jose Luis Suarez-Villafane, and Jimenez, Graffam & Lausell on brief for appellees.
Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, and COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Having reviewed the record and considered the parties' briefs, we are fully persuaded that the court below did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Since the reasons underlying this ruling are clearly set forth in the district court's opinion, see Salas-Rijos v. Costa Cruise Lines, N.V., No. 94-2342CCC (D.P.R. Feb. 9, 1995), we need go no further. Instead, we affirm the judgment for substantially the reasons elucidated by Chief Judge Cerezo in her well-reasoned rescript.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 F.3d 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salas-rojos-v-cruise-line-ca1-1997.