Salamone v. Commercial Coating Systems, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Salamone v. Commercial Coating Systems, Inc.

291 S.W.3d 855, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1248, 2009 WL 2870194

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2009·No. ED 92455·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steve Salamone (Employee) appeals from a final award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) that awarded him workers’ compensation benefits. Employee argues that the Commission erred in not awarding him certain temporary total disability payments.

The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steve Salamone (Employee) appeals from a final award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) that awarded him workers’ compensation benefits. Employee argues that the Commission erred in not awarding him certain temporary total disability payments.

The Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Salamone v. Commercial Coating Systems, Inc., 291 S.W.3d 855, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1248, 2009 WL 2870194 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

291 S.W.3d 855 (Salamone v. Commercial Coating Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related