Salamoff v. Godfrey
This text of 182 N.E.2d 482 (Salamoff v. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for negligent injury. The plaintiff and the individual defendant were members of the corporate defendant, Parkway Country Club, Inc., called Blue Hill Country Club, in which there was a steel-framed indoor golf practice cage. The plaintiff, who had driven some balls into the cage, either put down the driver, which was picked up by the individual defendant, or handed it to him. The plaintiff went to the rear of the room where he was struck in some manner by a ball while the individual defendant was practising. The judge directed verdicts for the defendants. There was no error. The plaintiff was the player immediately preceding the individual defendant and, although the plaintiff had finished practising, he had not left the room where the cage was when injured. The peril in remaining in what in effect was an enclosed driving range was obvious. The purpose was, of course, to drive into the net, but, as this ease shows, there was a risk that all balls would not find the mark. This risk the plaintiff assumed both as to the owner of the premises and as to the following player. Katz v. Gow, 321 Mass. 666. Pouliot v. Black, 341 Mass. 531. See Hietala v. Boston & Albany R.R. 295 Mass. 186, 188-191; Shaw v. Boston Am. League Baseball Co. 325 Mass. 419.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 N.E.2d 482, 344 Mass. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salamoff-v-godfrey-mass-1962.